In einem Text, der nächstes Jahr in New German Critique erscheinen wird, wende ich Postkritik auf Critical AI Studies an und plädiere dafür, die Oberflächen von LLM-Output als eigenständige Phänomene ernst zu nehmen.
Das englischsprachige Abstract:
Despite a potential plateau in ML advancement, the societal impact of large language models lies not in approaching superintelligence but in generating text surfaces indistinguishable from human writing. While Critical AI Studies provides essential material and socio-technical critique, it risks overlooking how LLMs phenomenologically reshape meaning-making. This paper proposes a semiotics of “surface integrity” as attending to the immediate plane where LLMs inscribe themselves into human communication. I distinguish three knowledge interests in ML research (epistemology, epistēmē, and epistemics) and argue for integrating surface-level stylistic analysis alongside depth-oriented critique. Through two case studies examining stylistic markers of synthetic text, I argue how attending to style as a semiotic phenomenon reveals LLMs as cultural machines that transform the conditions of meaning emergence and circulation in contemporary discourse, independent of questions about machine consciousness.
Den Text kann man hier lesen – und dabei lernen, was es mit “Woims” auf sich hat.